Collector’s Guide: Spoink (Emerald #66)

Spoink (ex Emerald 66) Collectors Guide

Character Intro

Spoink is a Common Pokémon card from the Emerald set, numbered 66. It features 50 HP and a single attack, Lunge. Its straightforward design makes it a solid pickup for collectors focused on the Emerald series.

Quick Facts

set_name release_date number rarity hp illustrator
Emerald 66 Common 50 Atsuko Nishida
  • Type: Psychic
  • Stage: Basic
  • Retreat Cost: 1 Colorless Energy
  • Weakness: Psychic ×2
  • Attack: Lunge — Flip a coin; if tails, this attack does nothing. Deals 20 damage.
  • Evolves From: None
  • Abilities: None

Key Printings

This guide focuses on Spoink from the ex Emerald set, card number 66. It is a Common rarity card with no known alternate printings or special editions within this set.

Variants & Identifiers

There are no known print variants for this Spoink. Identification is straightforward via set code “ex9” and card number “66.” The Atsuko Nishida illustration style is a notable visual cue.

Legality & Play Notes

Legality status: unknown. This card is not legal in Standard, Expanded, or Unlimited formats according to available data. Its simple attack and low HP suggest it is better suited for casual play or collection than competitive decks.

Care & Storage Tips

To preserve the artwork and condition, store this card in a protective sleeve away from direct sunlight and moisture. Avoid bending or scratching the surface, especially since common cards tend to be handled more frequently.

Set-by-Set Micro-summaries

  • ex Emerald: Spoink appears as a Basic Psychic-type with a straightforward attack and modest HP. It fits early-stage decks or ex-series collections. No additional print variants or special features are noted for this card.

Spoink ex Emerald 66

Catch This Card on eBay

Search live listings for Pokemon TCG Spoink Emerald.


Browse eBay listings

This section contains affiliate links. If you buy through them, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Spoink (Emerald) #66

Comments

Leave a Reply